We Belong to the World

So the UK General Election is over, the result is what it is – a hung Parliament – and there are many people around feeling very jaded. “Why did we have to have this unnecessary and damaging election?” they demand to know. “Does Brexit now have to change, or even be abandoned altogether?”

My hope for the future has only limited connection with the arguments about whether Britain stays in the single market or in the customs union. Whatever we do about such things, I feel we need to move on and be open to the world.

Some 40% of the UK’s trade is currently done with the European Union. Yet, historically, we belong to the world. For four centuries our country had a truly global reach. Our ships sailed far and wide, opening up new trade routes and markets, putting us in touch with a huge variety of peoples and their cultures. Our missionaries, too, took the message of Jesus to the remote corners of the earth.

Our relations with Europe have, of course, been intense over many centuries. We have repeatedly been involved in European strifes and struggles. On the plus side, have benefited hugely and in many ways from contact with the Continent. It continues to be seen as a place of opportunity for many of our young people.

It is also true that we can’t be said to have turned our backs on the wider world since joining the EU. But the time comes when a certain amount of re-balancing is needed.

I feel that time is now. The world is stirring. In countries long neglected and under-developed, the peoples begin to lift up their heads. Enterprise and initiative at last come to the fore. It is an exciting time. True, many of these states are unstable and unpredictable trading partners. Their democratic status is often weak and tenuous. But trade and enterprise have always thrived on adventure and risk.

Have I forgotten that I am blogging as a Christian? Have I begun to write purely political entries? No, because this world we belong to is God’s world. King David declares in Psalm 24,

“The earth is the LORD'S and the fulness thereof,
the world and those who dwell therein,
for he has founded it ...”

And He hasn’t just made the earth and walked away. He remains actively involved. In Genesis 18:25 the patriarch Abraham pleads with God,

“Shall not the Judge of all the earth do what is just?”

Many pagan nations thought that their gods specialised in one stretch of land (usually their own country). But the God of the Bible keeps breaking out of these barriers and showing His power throughout all the earth. In the Old Testament of our Bibles there are persistent indications that non-Jews, belonging to the nations outside the chosen people, would come to know this God and acknowledge His lordship. Jesus accepted this and prepared His followers to reach out beyond the boundaries of Israel. That is why, in His resurrected form, He announced to the disciples at the very beginning of the Book of Acts:

“But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the end of the earth.”

In the 18th century, an age when no clergyman was normally expected to function outside his own parish, John Wesley famously announced,

“I look on all the world as my parish; thus far I mean, that, in whatever part of it I am, I judge it meet, right, and my bounden duty, to declare unto all that are willing to hear, the glad tidings of salvation.”

EU or no EU, may we in Britain once again become God’s people reaching out to God’s earth with the message of the Saviour whom He sent.

The minute’s silence

As we prepared for our Challenge Walk at Pusey in Wiltshire, we were asked to stand for a minute of silence to remember the victims of the Manchester bombing of 22 May. The talking stopped. The drinking of coffee stopped. People stood with heads bowed, almost motionless. Only after a word from the organiser of the walk did the hall, which was our venue and starting point for the walk, come to life again.

It was a significant moment for me because it brought home what a crime victim had said in an interview some weeks before. I can remember nothing about the interview other than the person’s description of how they felt afterwards. It gave me a very clear impression of what such an experience must be like. “It’s as though you are frozen in time. Life stops from that moment on” (or words to that effect).

Frozen in time. Life stops. It is not so much as though you were caught in a photographic freeze frame. You still go through the routine of the day, each and every day. But that part of your life which was invested in the person that died has come to a halt. You will not wave them off to school or to their place of work the next working day. You will not watch them develop as people and personalities. You will not see how they are shaped by the various landmarks that occur in life. All that is placed on hold, never to resume – not in this life, at any rate.

Those involved in bereavement counselling will tell you that mourning, even though it goes on long after a person’s friends think they should have “got over it by now”, is in fact quite reasonable and natural. It only becomes toxic when the person, as one of my tutors put it, “gets stuck somewhere”. Somehow the person fails to move through the recognised stages of mourning to a point of acceptance. Queen Victoria never stopped being dressed in mourning after the death of Prince Albert. She never allowed any change in the rooms they had shared together – they stayed as monuments to the past. She, and in some ways her family and court and the whole nation and empire, suffered as a result.

But, certainly in the case of a bombing, who can you blame for grieving victims being frozen in time? Surely not them. It is, purely and simply, the bombers and their accomplices.

What can free us from being frozen in time, functioning like that word from the walk organiser which ended the minute’s silence? The Lord of time and eternity – Christ Himself. He came announcing that the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand. Before then, when the angel announced to His mother Mary that she would give birth to Him, these were the angel’s words:

“… you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus. He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High. And the Lord God will give to him the throne of his father David, and he will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will be no end” (Luke 1:31-33 ESV).

Time may or may not have stopped for you. But you can come over to One in whose presence time will no longer matter.

Crown Him the Lord of years,

the potentate of time,

creator of the rolling spheres,

ineffably sublime!

All hail, Redeemer, hail!

For Thou hast died for me:

Thy praise shall never, never fail

throughout eternity.

Matthew Bridges, 1800-94 and Godfrey Thring, 1823-1903

The Curate’s Egg

It is always satisfying to find out exactly where a popular saying comes from. Often we are not sure, but in the case of this one we can be precise: “It’s like the curate’s egg - good in parts”.

Have you come across that expression? It is gradually fading from use, but was much repeated at one time. It came into being with the above cartoon from Punch magazine way back at the tail end of the 19th century.

A bishop has invited a lowly curate from one of the parishes in his diocese to tea. The curate is anxious to please. If he proves himself to be socially well adjusted - a good guest, in other words - the bishop may give him preferment in the future.

Problems arise almost immediately when the curate cuts through the shell of the egg. An objectionable sulphurous smell wafts across the room. The curate’s egg happens to have gone bad! The curate is terrified of doing the wrong thing. “I’m afraid you’ve got a bad egg, Mr Jones,” comments the bishop. “Oh no, my Lord, I assure you!” the flustered junior cleric replies in haste. “Parts of it are excellent!”

Audiences were still chuckling at this comical reply decades after the cartoon was first published. Indeed, the Curate’s Egg became proverbial in English usage. Perhaps we would be less comfortable about it if we realised what it says about our society to this very day.

A conference speaker mentioned the saying and mused, 

“How would the apostle Paul have reacted? He wouldn’t have said the egg was 'good in parts'. He would have exclaimed straight out that it was a rotten one!”

Why did the speaker come to that conclusion? Because Paul was never mealy-mouthed. He called a spade a spade, especially where the ills of the sick and sinful society around him were concerned. In 1 Corinthians chapter 6 he retorts,

“... do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.” (ESV)

Paul did not express himself that way because he enjoyed condemning people. His aim was to warn. It was also to encourage those new Christians who had those things in their background in the pagan society where they lived. For that reason he went on,

“And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.”

You may agree or disagree about the various groups mentioned above needing to be washed clean spiritually in order to be right with God. But there is no doubting the fact that today’s society does not encourage us to be forthright. It conditions us to avoid making reference to “rotten eggs”. It would instead urge us to call them “good in parts”.

And all the while, the foul smell that envelops the genteel dining table makes its own clear statement.

Oh, no - Not Another Election

The iconic Brenda from Bristol has the entire nation in stitches - and nodding in agreement - with her expression of disgust at the calling of yet another election: “You’re joking? Not another one. ... I can’t stand this. There’s too much politics going on at the moment. Why does she [Prime Minister Theresa May] need to do it?”

In my worst moments I might echo her views. That was especially the case when I examined the voting paper for our local Parish Council elections (I vote by post, as I find polling booths too intimidating) and saw a list of 17 names, most of which I had never heard of, and had to somehow select up to 15. And that is just one of three elections in the space of six weeks.

However, we are extremely fortunate and favoured to live in a democracy. I would hate to have to rub along in a dictatorship where the ruling warlord portrays himself as the “father of the people”, benevolently patronising his little “children”. All the while, you find, he has been inflicting the most brutal oppression on any who dare to dissent.

There is much argument about whether the Bible model for a church is democratic or not. In my Congregational church stream it is important that the members’ meeting is the ultimate decision-making body. Allowance is made, of course, for church leaders to use their discretion in delicate pastoral matters or ones where a swift response is required. The danger is that an assertive meeting may hamper or thwart a pastor who actually has Bible warrant and divine authority for a certain course of action. In that way a church can go counter to God’s will.

In many cases a democratic constitution would have brought disaster in the history of God’s people. Let us say the Exodus from Egypt to the Promised Land was put to the vote. The majority might well have voted to take the people right back to Egypt!

Many Reformed Christians would say that God’s preferred type of government for His people is theocracy. There the church is run, not by committee or by popular mandate, but by God Himself.

Of course, God is unlikely to send down instructions about what colour to paint the walls. Someone has to take decisions on matters where the Bible has nothing to say. But in practice that means that someone on the human side of the organisation needs to wield day to day power. And therein lies the problem. Churches that claim to be organised as “theocracies” can easily spawn leaders who come over as the benevolent dictators I mentioned earlier, patronising their spiritual “children” and displaying alarming levels of abuse in the process.

As Sir Winston Churchill once said,  
“Democracy is the worst system devised by the wit of man, except for all the others.”

Let’s not be cynical about democracy. Those who offer themselves to be voted on by us are likely to have something of a love for people. After all, they must be prepared for rejection by the people if they lose the election, and willing to accept the decision with good grace.

Isn’t there a small echo of our Saviour in that? The Lord Jesus Christ was on a divinely-appointed mission to save humankind. But he was prepared to face utter rejection and scorn from precisely the people He had come to redeem. Did He do it gladly and with grace? Supremely so.

“... Jesus, the founder and perfecter of our faith, who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is seated at the right hand of the throne of God.
“Consider him who endured from sinners such hostility against himself, so that you may not grow weary or fainthearted” (Hebrews 12:2-3 ESV).

“Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, by taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. And being found in human form, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross. Therefore God has highly exalted him” (Philippians 2:5-9).

Do, please, support our democratic process. It is at least as likely to fulfil God’s purpose as any other type of government.

Bread of the Presence

It is a mysterious story which repeatedly breaks into the flow of the Bible and then disappears again. We find ourselves hearing at least an echo of God’s mind about the life and sacrificial death of the Lord Jesus. Here, then, is the story of Easter from a totally unexpected angle.

It concerns a strange Jewish institution called the Bread of the Presence. The account begins with a command of God through Moses in Leviticus chapter 24. God decrees that there is to be a table of pure gold in the Jewish Tabernacle (the precursor to the Jerusalem Temple) that would always have two piles of six bread cakes on it. The bread would be a food offering, but would stay on the table rather than be offered like an animal sacrifice. Every Sabbath day a new consignment would be neatly placed on the table and the old apparently eaten by the priests, and only the priests, as it was most holy.

We then move on to a curious incident that took place in some desperate days for David, the future King of Israel, and his followers (1 Samuel 21). Persecuted and beleaguered by King Saul in the waning days of Saul’s kingship, David desperately needs food for some of his young men. He asks the priest Ahimelech for whatever he can spare.  All there is is the Bread of the Presence, which the priest calls holy bread. He can only supply it if the young men are ritually clean. David assures him that they are. The priest then gives him the bread. In effect, ordinary soldiers are being treated as though they were privileged like priests.

Jesus uses this story as an effective argument against those who were criticizing the actions of His disciples. On one occasion these disciples were plucking some ears of corn from local cornfields for food. This was acceptable practice except that it was the Sabbath that day, when “work” was forbidden. The Pharisees challenged Jesus. Jesus replied,

“Have you not read what David did when he was hungry, he and those who were with him: how he entered the house of God and took and ate the bread of the Presence, which is not lawful for any but the priests to eat, and also gave it to those with him?” And he said to them, “The Son of Man is lord of the Sabbath” (Luke 6:3-5 ESV).

With this one brief story a number of key points emerges. Here are just some:

    •    God’s Presence is for ever with His people. Jesus is Immanuel, “God with us”.
    •    Jesus says, “I am the Bread”. He is the living Bread from heaven, spiritual food to make us alive and nourish us.
    •    This is holy bread. With the Lord Jesus we are handling holy things.
    •    Jesus is our great High Priest, who makes His followers “a kingdom and priests to our God” (Revelation 5:10).
    •    Jesus is a merciful High Priest. He sets aside the strictness of God’s law to still our pangs of hunger and make us clean before God.
    •    In the Presence of God with us, and our coming to Him in the Lord Jesus, we have an eternal covenant. Holy Communion is now the sign of this.

Thank God for the rich meaning of that far-off piece of ceremony, the Bread of the Presence. May we present ourselves with reverence and Easter hope to our awesome, holy yet merciful God, the Father of Jesus Christ who gave His life as spiritual food for us and rose again.

Heroes?

A commentator remarked that the person who should be best remembered over the incident that developed in London that terrible day Wednesday last week is not the infamous Khalid Mahmood who perpetrated the appalling crime. He should be forgotten. The one remembered should be Tobias Ellwood, who battled for many minutes, that must have seemed like an eternity, to revive the dying policeman, Keith Palmer, with mouth-to-mouth resuscitation. He failed; but the point is that he was there and he tried.

It is these two actors in the drama whose names should live on while all else is forgotten. I don't think that will happen, because it is human nature to sensationalise crime and to speculate endlessly over the motivation of those who committed it. It becomes an absorbing fascination, the subject of ghoulish documentaries for decades to come.

Not that either of the other two men I have mentioned would seek to be remembered as heroes. As in the best traditions of service, they would claim that they were only doing their duty.

The Bible tells us that that is indeed all that God's servants should think about themselves when they had have done their Master's wishes.

“Will any one of you who has a servant plowing or keeping sheep say to him when he has come in from the field, ‘Come at once and recline at table’? Will he not rather say to him, ‘Prepare supper for me, and dress properly, and serve me while I eat and drink, and afterward you will eat and drink’? Does he thank the servant because he did what was commanded? So you also, when you have done all that you were commanded, say, ‘We are unworthy servants; we have only done what was our duty.’” Luke 17:7-12 ESV

Servants should not expect appreciation, but reckon that they have only done what they were supposed to do. As always, our example is our Master and Saviour. In fact the word “duty” falls short of describing the devotion of our Saviour to serving. It is more accurate to say that He was on mission. He fulfilled His heavenly Father’s commission to Him. It took Him all the way to the cross, but He did not flinch. In fact it was a joy to Him to play His supreme part in the Father’s plan to save the lost.

May we gladden His heart as we receive the salvation He came to give and then go on to serve others without looking for reward.

O Son of Man, our hero strong and tender,
Whose servants are the brave in all the earth,
Our living sacrifice to Thee we render,
Who sharest all our sorrows, all our mirth.

O feet so strong to climb the path of duty,
O lips divine that taught the word of truth,
Kind eyes that marked the lilies in their beauty,
And heart that kindled at the zeal of youth.

Frank Fletcher, 1870-1954

The famous parable of the sheep and the goats tells us that people will actually be surprised to learn that they have done their duty: fed the hungry, clothe the naked, heal the sick and visit prisoners. "When did we do that?" they will protest. But the Master will simply reply,

"Truly, I say to you, as you did it to one of the least of these my brothers, you did it to me" (Matthew 25:40).

Diana or Christ?

Years ago I was gripped by my first sight of this arresting picture by the Victorian artist Edwin Longsden Long, entitled “Diana or Christ?”

This dramatic and, at the time, very popular picture is evocative of the pressures that were placed upon early Christians to conform to the religion of the day. The ugly form of the many-breasted Diana is on the left. She was a blatantly pagan goddess, also known as Artemis, with prominent headquarters in the ancient city of Ephesus.

The artist imagines a scene later in time where a young girl – who has the light shining on her and takes centre stage – is presented with an ultimatum to worship Diana, or else. We see the hard-faced acolytes of this goddess looking on from around the horrible statue, impatiently waiting for the girl to submit. Just a pinch of incense is all that is required to signal her allegiance to the goddess! Her boyfriend is begging her to conform and save her life. The town recorder pitilessly reads out to her the charge of blasphemy against the goddess. The priest of Diana, seated, looks venerable but menacing at the same time. Two young children, still in their innocence, stare wide-eyed at this girl, failing to comprehend why she will not worship their goddess. Soldiers mingle around, steeling themselves to receive orders to execute the girl if and when she fails to comply with the demands of the authorities. Maybe she will be killed publicly to entertain the crowd behind.

When the apostle Paul visited Ephesus, he was seen as a rival to this established Diana cult. We read about this in Acts 19. Those who profited by selling trinkets relating to Diana perceived a danger to their trade. They set up a huge demonstration at which the clamour went up for two hours: 

“Great is Diana of the Ephesians!” 

Paul was surely fortunate to escape with his life from that place.

It seems to me that we are facing exactly the same choice as the girl – Diana or Christ? – in today’s Britain. The goddess figure today might not be Diana, but it is something equally secular and degrading. There are the siren voices telling us that we must be even-handed with all minorities, whether they obey God’s law or not. Then there are those forced to go along with corruption or exploitation in the workplace. In all these different ways we are expected to compromise – to offer that little pinch of incense to Diana. Will we choose her – or will we choose Christ? You wonder whether there is anybody left who is willing to make the unpopular choice of the Lord Jesus Christ. Yet make it we must, if we are not to betray than those who have gone before us in the faith. They held out amid great provocation and great oppression. They kept a clear conscience and a consistent witness for Christ.

It is not as if what they went through took them by surprise. The Lord Jesus Himself prophesied that persecutions would take place. He promised no cushy outcome even for those who were the most prominent in His service. The rewards will be worth every trouble, but will only be fully realised in the life to come.

Do we trust in the life to come where everything is put to rights? We too often have a wrong perspective – basically kidding ourselves that this life is all there is, and we had better feather our own nest as far as possible in order to get the best enjoyment out of it. This would be a grave mistake. A life beckons where we spend eternity in the company of our Saviour in heaven.

The apostle Paul writes:

Therefore I endure everything for the sake of the elect, that they also may obtain the salvation that is in Christ Jesus with eternal glory.
The saying is trustworthy, for:

If we have died with him, we will also live with him;
if we endure, we will also reign with him;
if we deny him, he also will deny us;
if we are faithless, he remains faithful—
for he cannot deny himself. 
2 Timothy 2:10-13 ESV